Friday, February 27, 2015

Mars On Earth

by MA, Science 5HSquires


The 5th grade did a rover simulation. The purpose of the simulation was to compare to the real Mars rovers. Another purpose of the rover simulation is to find out the different temperatures in the room. We were trying to figure out why some temperatures were different in the same room. We experienced both driving rovers and moving as rovers.


The simulation worked by dividing everyone in groups of four. There would be two drivers and two rovers. The drivers would send one-step commands and the rovers would follow the command. The rovers would not bump into an object and destroy itself. It would go around the object and continue. There would be a two minute delay when drivers were sending the commands. If the rovers could follow the command successfully, they would send back complete. If the rovers could not follow the command, they would send back fail.



The simulation was different than I thought it would be, because the delay feels longer than it really is. It is really exciting when you plan a path for the rover. It is frustrating when there is a fail. It can also be frustrating when the plan is long and slow. The simulation helped me understand how mars rovers communicate with the drivers.


We had a conversation with the real rover driver Scott Maxwell. He told us about failures, rovers, procedures, and commands. He also told us about when Spirit fell into a sand trap. The procedure for getting Spirit to still work was to have it take sample info and send it back. He told us about microorganisms that probably lived on Mars. He told us it usually takes a few hours to make a program.


In conclusion, the experience is great because you know what is like to be the rover and the driver. The delay is less than it really is in space, but it sets a good example for timing. With Scott Maxwell, we learned about many interesting things. I had a great time doing this, and I hope to do something like this again!

Monday, November 17, 2014

Germination Experiments

Investigations in Germination
by Sci 4 Oppy & Spirit

We have been studying germination. Germination is the stage when the seed sprouts - the seed coat splits and the radicle comes out. We were trying to find out what would work best for alfalfa seeds to germinate.

IMG_5561.JPG IMG_5591.JPG

We had these hypotheses, seeds need:

  • need water to germinate (wwc)
  • need light to germinate (ds)
  • need soil to germinate (es)
  • need carbon dioxide to germinate (al)
  • need nitrogen to germinate (al)
  • need potassium to germinate (ar)
  • need phosphorous to germinate (jrs)
  • need oxygen to germinate (lt)
  • needs proper temperature (ar)
  • needs bacteria to germinate (es)
  • needs proper pH (es)

*“proper” amount may vary by species of plants

To test our hypotheses we glued 5 seeds to a piece of circular filter paper and put that in a petri dish. The petri dishes went into a container with water about 1 cm deep.

IMG_5592.JPG

In our first trial, we put seeds in water and under constant light. We also put seeds under the light without water. The seeds that were dry did not germinate. The seeds that were wet germinated in two days. From this we concluded that seeds need water to trigger germination.
Screen Shot 2014-11-03 at 11.37.52 AM.png

In our second trial, we asked, do they need light. We put the seeds in a dark cupboard to test this. The seeds germinated without light, but the cotyledons didn’t turn green, they were a pale yellow instead. The hypocotyls were white and very long. This tells us that seeds don’t need light to trigger germination. We think the hypocotyls were so long because they were trying to reach light.

Screen Shot 2014-11-03 at 11.36.54 AM.png

In the third trial, we tested how temperature would affect germination. We put one set of seeds in an incubator at 35°C and another set in the refrigerator at 18°C. The seeds in the incubator germinated faster than at room temperature. Most of the seeds in the refrigerator did not germinate at all. The ones that did, grew v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y. So, seeds like warmer temperatures to germinate. We wondered if the embryos in the cold seeds were still alive. We moved them to the room temperature and they germinated. The embryos were still alive.

Our fourth trial tested if the seeds could germinate in salt water. We made salt water solutions of 10 g/L, 5 g/L, 2 ½ g/L and 1 ¼ g/L. Only 7 of 40 seeds germinated at 5 or 10 g/L after 5 days. We moved these seeds to freshwater to see if the embryos were still alive. After 2 days, 6 more seeds germinated when moved to the fresh water for a total of 13 of 40 seeds. In 2 ½ and 1 ¼ g/L, most of the seeds germinated after two days. So that means the embryos can tolerate salt water at a low level. Less than 2 ½ g/L.

Our fifth experiment was to see if seeds needed air to germinate. We put seeds in a test tube completely filled with water and no air bubbles and put a rubber stopper to seal the test tube. After 5 days, the seeds had swelled up and the seed coats had lost color, but no germination. We put these seeds in petri dishes to see if the embryos had drowned or suffocated. We found that some of them were still able to germinate.
IMG_5594.JPG

Doing these experiments, we learned that seeds need certain things to trigger germination. We also learned that science takes time. You can’t rush an experiment or you will mess things up. Sometimes you have to wait a few days to get your data. Experiments have to be carefully planned out. You can’t just say, “Let’s go!” and jump into action. You have to plan before you can do science. We also learned that the most important part of an experiment is the control. We have to have a control to see if there is any difference in the experiments. Our control was seeds germinated in “regular” conditions: room temperature, water and constant light.

Friday, November 14, 2014

Maths Likes

Math5 asked mathematicians on Twitter, "What do you like about math(s)?" We got some great responses. You can see the responses by clicking this link: https://storify.com/mwilkinson3/maths-likes?utm_content=storify-pingback&utm_medium=sfy.co-twitter&utm_campaign=&utm_source=t.co&awesm=sfy.co_bzd6


Sunday, October 5, 2014

Soil Nutrient Lab

Soil Nutrient Lab


Our work in Michael’s 4th Grade Science class this year started with looking at the needs of living things. We came up with all kinds of things we thought we needed, but narrowed down to the basic needs of living things: food, water, air, habitat. We’ve been told that the plants bring the nutrients into the ecosystem by absorbing them from the soil. We wanted to see if we could find those nutrients ourselves. We learned that there are three main nutrients for life: nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorous. So we decided to test for these in the garden. Shouldn’t there be plenty of nutrients there since we were growing things to eat?

Collecting Soil Samples


We collected soil samples from the garden beds, the pond, the area outside the garden beds under the woodchips, and in the runoff from the playground by the bridge. We tested each of these soils for the three nutrients and found that while there was sufficient phosphorous and potassium in the soil, there was very little nitrogen. When we went back to the garden, we could see the effect on the squash plants. Their leaves were yellow-green with yellow and brown spots and the edges of the leaves were dry brown. These were signs of not enough nitrogen.


These leaves don't look healthy.


How can we grow healthy plants to eat in a garden without enough nitrogen? We wanted to find a way to improve the soil, so we brainstormed some solutions. We thought adding compost or fertilizer might help. We also remembered that there are some plants that help put nitrogen into the soil. We remembered from our “Three-Sisters” study last year (corn-beans-squash) that one of the things the beans did was help with nitrogen, we thought planting beans might help. We also wanted to try alfalfa. So we took some small pots and prepared the soil five different ways: control soil with no change, soil mixed with osmocote pellets, soil mixed with compost, soil planted with beans, soil planted with alfalfa. We put these under constant light and water and will test the soil nitrogen levels in a few weeks.


In the meantime, we learned that bacteria helped convert nitrogen from the air into nitrogen that plant roots could absorb. Maybe there wasn’t enough bacteria in the soil from the garden. Upperschool Science Teacher (and class parent) Howie Waldman came to class to help us grow some bacteria from the soil and compost. It only took a day for there to be a lot of growth. Howie is going to help us to try to make microscope slides of the bacteria next, so we can see individual cells.


We also noticed a lot of living things in the compost - macroinvertibrate decomposers. We found nematodes, earthworms, pseudoscorpions, weevils, isopods, and others we haven’t yet identified.


We’re learning a lot about soil, how it works and how it helps us to be healthy. Like the song says, dirt really did make our lunch. We can’t live without healthy soil.



DATA UPDATE 10/21/14

After one month, we tested our soil treatments for nitrogen levels with Rapitest kits:


Soil Treatment
Nitrogen Level after 1 month
Control
Depleted (N0)
Osmocote
Surplus (N4+)
Compost
Surplus (N4+)
Beans
Deficient (N1)
Alfalfa
Deficient (N1)


Conclusions

We can improve the nitrogen in the soil using compost and Osmocote. It only takes a little of these to raise the nitrogen in the soil. Planting beans and alfalfa changed the nitrogen a little bit, we need a lot more bean and alfalfa or more time to bring the nitrogen up enough. So, if we want healthy garden soil, we need to add a little compost to the soil.

Friday, June 7, 2013

Filling the Pool


by Math5

As a culminating project for our geometry unit, my students engaged in the following project. This project required that they organize their problem-solving approach, collaborate with each other, and apply many of the skills and concepts developed in 5th Grade Mathematics this year. The following is the account of this work written by the students themselves.




One day, we walked into math class and we saw a question posted on the board:
“How long does it take to fill the pool?”

At first we thought that it would be easy to find out. After all, we had a lot of practice finding volume of a rectangular prism. We all immediately left for the pool, to get our measurements. As we walked over and as we started taking our measurements, we realized that we couldn’t just take the measurements, because there was a curve at the bottom of the pool. That’s where most of our project came in. Suddenly the simple question on the board became a project that we worked on for a week and a half.  





Estimating the Volume of the Pool

We came up with four different ways to estimate the volume of the pool.

For the first estimate we made, we had to pretend that the pool was broken up into smaller rectangular prisms. So the bottom of the pool looked like a staircase. We multiplied the depth of each prism times the width of the pool times the length of each prism.

The individual prisms were:
1.3m x 14m x 2.6m= 47.32m3
1.4m x 14m x 5m= 98m3
1.5m x 14m x 3.9 = 81.9m3
1.9m x 14m x 3.8m=103.74m3
2m x 14m x 7m= 196m3
1.9m x 14m x 1m=26.6m3
When, we added up all of the volumes, we got the estimated volume, 553.56m3.

For the second estimate, we built a model of the pool out of blocks representing one cubic meter. The first layer of blocks was 23x14 cubes (the surface of water exposed) and the second layer was 18x14 cubes. When we added all the cubes up we got 574 cubes. So our third estimation for the volume is 574 cubic meters.




In the third estimate we used mean depth to figure out the volume. We found the mean depth by adding all the depths of the pool and then dividing it by the amount of depths (6). We then used the length of the pool, the width of the pool, and the mean depth of the pool, 1.7 m to find the volume of a rectangular prism. We multiplied 14•23•1.7 and got 547.4 cubic meters. So our third estimate for the volume is 574 cubic meters.  
For the fourth estimate we turned the whole pool into a trapezoidal prism. Then we flipped it 90° onto its east side. We first needed to find the area of the trapezoidal base. 3.3 meters is the sum of the lengths of two bases of the trapezoidal face of the pool (the parallel sides). These are really the east and west walls of the pool, but to make it easier to think about, we’re thinking of them as the top and bottom base of the trapezoidal prism. The height of the trapezoid is length of the pool (23 m). To find the area: (3.3 • 23) / 2 = 37.95 m2 for “Base area.” Volume is Base Area • Height of Prism: 37.95 • 14 = 531.3 m3.

Later, we figured out the mean of all of our estimated volumes, and found an approximate answer of how many cubic meters are in the pool.

Depending upon the method we used we got 4 different estimates for the volume of the pool

1. Breaking the pool into rectangular prisms based on the depths, we got 553.56m3

2. Rounding the depths, we got 574m3

3. Finding the mean depths, we got 547.4m3

4. Thinking of the pool as a trapezoidal prism, we got 531 .3m3

The 1st estimate + the 2nd estimate + the 3rd estimate + the 4th estimate / 4 (the number of estimates) =  551.565 m3 = mean average of the pool volume.

Measuring Flow Rate

Measuring how much time it takes water to fill a certain volume.
We found the time it took to fill a 1 liter graduated cylinder 5 times and averaged it. We found a mean of 9.868 seconds to fill 1 liter from the classroom sink. The way we found this rate was we had one person holding the cylinder under the running water, one person had a stopwatch, and one person watch the water level and told the timer when to click stop. We took 5 trials and the times we got were: 9.603, 10.606, 9.067, 9.816, and 10.248 seconds. Measuring was hard because the bubbles in the water threw us off. The mean was 9.868 seconds. Since 1000 liters equals one cubic meter we multiplied 9.868 by 1000 and got 9,868 seconds to fill one cubic meter. Since 10,000 seconds doesn’t mean much, we converted this to bigger time units.
9,868 seconds / 3600 = 2.741 hrs
That means it would take 2.741 hours to fill one cubic meter of water using the classroom sink.

Since we found that there were 551.565 cubic meters of water in the pool, we can multiply the volume by time to fill one cubic meter to find out how long it would take to fill the pool.
551.565 m3 • 2.741 hrs/m3 = 1511.840 hrs to fill the pool with the classroom sink.

1511.840 / 24 = 62.993 days or about 2 months!

We all know that you don’t fill a swimming pool with a classroom sink. We thought Facilities probably had a bigger pipe to fill the pool.



We wanted to know what Facilities thought of our investigatigation. We composed an email with all of our information and a question for them that said “We want to know,  How long does it take to fill the pool with the equipment that you guys fill the pool with?” They replied the next day. The email said “We have two water feeds in the pool, one is a 2 inch pipe , and one is a 1 inch.  The one inch fill line is attached to a float, so it goes on automatically when the water is low.”  That was really helpful.

All we had to do now was divide the volume by the volume per minute.  The volume of the pool is 551.565 cubic meters, as we learned earlier, and the volume per minute with the two inch pipe is 127 gallons per minute.  We were using liters, so we had to translate 127 gallons into liters, which is 480.747 liters.  We had to turn 551.565 cubic meters into liters too, which is 551,565 liters.  So, finally, we divided 551,565/480.747 which is 1,147.308 and got our answer.  But again, it is a very confusing way of reading time, so we divided it by 60, which is about 19 hours.  So it would take about 19 hours to completely fill the pool using the pool’s plumbing.

Then, of course, Michael wasn’t satisfied and tossed us another question: “What if the pool level had dropped by 2” and the refill pipe (1” diameter) had to bring the pool back to full level, how long would that take?”

Evan from Facilities informs us that there are two pipes used to fill the pool. The primary pipe is a 2 in diameter and would supply 127 gallons per minute. The second pipe, a 1 inch pipe at the top of the pool is used to automatically refill the pool when the level drops more than 2”.  

The first step was finding the volume of the missing water.  We knew that the width and length are 14 meters and 23 meters, but we needed to convert 2 inches to metric.  That happens to be 0.0508 meters, so we proceeded to do the multiplication problem: 0.0508x14x23 which equals 16.3576 m3.  So we knew the volume of the missing water.  

Next was the time to replace the missing water.  That could be figured out by dividing the amount the volume by the volume per minute.  We transferred 16.3576 cubic meters into liters which is 16357.6 liters.  Then we transferred 37 gallons into liters too, which is 140.06024 liters.  So 140.06024 liters per minute.  Finally we divided 16357.6/140.06024 which is 116.789747040274 and got our answer.  The only thing was, there are easier ways of writing time than 116 minutes, so we wrote 1 hour 56 minutes 48 seconds instead.  

We had a lot of fun doing this project and it was a huge learning experience.  It is a really fun project and hopefully we will get to do things like this in the future because it was a fun experience  to us kids.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Flower Power 2013

By Sci4

As a culminating project in Grade 4 Science, at the end of our study of plant growth and reproduction, we each designed a flower that could be pollinated by a specific pollinator. Some of us chose bees, some chose butterflies, a few picked bats, and some chose hummingbirds. We had to create a flower that would attract the chosen pollinator, be the right size and shape, and reward the pollinator to keep it coming back.

To view our projects, click the links below:

Flower Power 2013 Final Projects